Question explored with the scientific record
What is the best NOAC drug for long term use in a 69 yr old male in sinus Rythm with previous documented Atrial Fibrillation and two successful Cardioversion
The short version: apixaban has the best safety profile for long-term use in a 69-year-old man with prior atrial fibrillation and successful cardioversion.
The evidence consistently shows apixaban has the lowest risk of major bleeding and intracranial hemorrhage among the NOACs, while providing stroke prevention at least as good as warfarin. The ARISTOTLE trial, a double-blind randomized study of 18,201 patients, found apixaban reduced stroke or systemic embolism to 1.27% per year versus 1.60% with warfarin, and major bleeding to 2.13% per year versus 3.09% [6, 9]. Intracranial hemorrhage was cut by more than half [6]. A 2018 real-world study of over 45,000 patients found apixaban had the lowest major bleeding risk of any NOAC, with a hazard ratio of 0.53 compared to warfarin [14]. The same study found rivaroxaban had a 1.82 times higher bleeding risk than apixaban [14].
Dabigatran 150 mg is slightly more effective than apixaban for preventing ischemic stroke, but it increases gastrointestinal bleeding. The RE-LY trial found dabigatran 150 mg reduced stroke to 1.11% per year versus 1.69% with warfarin, but gastrointestinal bleeding rose to 1.51% per year versus 1.02% [26]. A 2016 Medicare study of over 100,000 elderly patients found rivaroxaban had higher rates of intracranial hemorrhage, major extracranial bleeding, and gastrointestinal bleeding compared to dabigatran [13]. A 2018 primary care cohort study found rivaroxaban was associated with a 19% increase in all-cause mortality compared to warfarin [22].
For a 69-year-old man in sinus rhythm after successful cardioversion, the key question is long-term safety. The risk of recurrent atrial fibrillation is real, but the daily bleeding risk from anticoagulation is constant. Apixaban offers the best balance: effective stroke prevention with the lowest bleeding rates. The standard dose is 5 mg twice daily, reduced to 2.5 mg twice daily if he is over 80, weighs under 60 kg, or has a creatinine over 1.5 mg/dL [9].
| Drug | Stroke rate per year | Major bleeding per year | Intracranial hemorrhage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apixaban | 1.27% | 2.13% | 0.33% |
| Dabigatran 150 mg | 1.11% | 3.11% | 0.30% |
| Rivaroxaban | 1.7% | 3.6% | Reduced vs warfarin |
| Warfarin | 1.6-1.69% | 3.09-3.36% | 0.38% |
My call: apixaban 5 mg twice daily is the best choice for long-term use in this patient, with the caveat that no NOAC has been compared to a true placebo in a modern long-term safety trial in sinus-rhythm patients after cardioversion. Confidence: moderate.
Sources used 6
-
The new oral anticoagulants and stroke
This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants compared to warfarin in preventing strokes in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation, highlighting their advantages and limitations.
DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2012.09.011 -
Comparative Efficacy and Safety of the Non–Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants for Patients with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation
A 2015 narrative review summarizing the efficacy and safety of four non–vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban) versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, and discussing guideline implications and pragmatic considerations f…
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1544156 -
Stroke, Bleeding, and Mortality Risks in Elderly Medicare Beneficiaries Treated With Dabigatran or Rivaroxaban for Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation
This study compares the risks of thromboembolic stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, major extracranial bleeding, and mortality between elderly Medicare beneficiaries treated with dabigatran and rivaroxaban for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, finding that rivaroxaban is associated …
DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.5954 -
Real-world comparison of major bleeding risk among non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients initiated on apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or warfarin
Apixaban and dabigatran reduce major bleeding risk versus warfarin in real-world non-valvular AF initiators; rivaroxaban shows no overall difference versus warfarin, but higher bleeding risk than apixaban when NOACs are compared.
DOI: 10.1160/th16-05-0403 -
Risks and benefits of direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin in a real world setting: cohort study in primary care
This cohort study investigates the risks of bleeding, ischaemic stroke, venous thromboembolism, and all-cause mortality associated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) compared to warfarin in a real-world primary care setting, finding that apixaban is the safest option while …
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.k2505 -
Dabigatran versus Warfarin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation
In a large global randomized trial in atrial fibrillation patients at risk for stroke, dabigatran given as 110 mg or 150 mg twice daily was noninferior to warfarin for stroke or systemic embolism, with the 150 mg dose superior to warfarin, while both doses reduced intracranial h…
DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa0905561