OpenNeedle Ask your own

Question explored with the scientific record

Are there any human trials for ivermectin

Sep 15, 2026 · 6 sources used · OpenNeedle synthesis
The short version: ivermectin has been tested in dozens of human trials for COVID-19, and the largest, highest-quality ones show it does not work for that disease. It does work for scabies.

The most definitive evidence comes from a 2025 meta-analysis of 23 randomized trials involving 12,345 patients [1]. It found no statistically significant improvement in viral clearance, hospitalization duration, or symptom resolution. The pooled effect on hospitalization was not significant (p=0.15), and symptom resolution also missed significance (p=0.07) [1]. This is the kind of evidence that matters: a large, pooled analysis of randomized, placebo-controlled trials. The earlier, smaller studies that showed benefit, like a 2021 trial of ivermectin plus doxycycline that reported faster recovery (median 7 vs 9 days, p=0.003) [2], were not replicated at scale.

For scabies, the picture is different. Multiple trials show oral ivermectin is effective, though topical permethrin is usually somewhat better. A 2025 trial of 100 patients found permethrin significantly more effective at reducing clinical scores over two weeks [3]. A 2019 study of 195 patients found permethrin had 89% improvement in pruritus versus 80% for ivermectin, a difference that was not statistically significant (p=0.14) [5]. A 2016 study found 79.5% cure with ivermectin versus 88.1% with permethrin (p=0.157) [6]. So ivermectin works for scabies, just not as well as the topical alternative.

OutcomeIvermectinComparatorStatistical significance
COVID-19 hospitalization (meta-analysis, 23 trials, n=12,345)No significant reductionPlacebop=0.15 [1]
COVID-19 symptom resolution (meta-analysis)No significant improvementPlacebop=0.07 [1]
Scabies cure at 4 weeks (2016 trial, n=86)79.5%Permethrin 88.1%p=0.157 [6]
Scabies pruritus improvement at 6 weeks (2019 trial, n=195)80%Permethrin 89.2%p=0.14 [5]

The safety signal is worth noting. A pharmacovigilance analysis of 517 reports found systemic ivermectin was associated with a 3.34-fold increased reporting odds for severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs) like Stevens-Johnson syndrome, and a 7.08-fold increase for toxidermias specifically [4]. These are rare but serious. The absolute risk is low, but the signal is real.

My call: for COVID-19, the evidence from large randomized trials is clear that ivermectin provides no meaningful benefit. For scabies, it works but is second-line to topical permethrin. Confidence: high for COVID-19, moderate for scabies.

Keep digging

Sources used 6

  1. Repurposing Anthelmintic Drugs for COVID-19 Treatment: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials on Ivermectin and Mebendazole Antibiotics (2025) Thin

    An up-to-date meta-analysis of 23 randomized trials (n = 12,345) evaluating ivermectin and mebendazole for COVID-19 found no statistically significant improvement in viral clearance, hospitalization duration, or symptom resolution overall, although some individual studies sugges…

    DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics14050459
  2. Ivermectin in combination with doxycycline for treating COVID-19 symptoms: a randomized trial Journal of International Medical Research (2021) Thin

    Combining ivermectin with doxycycline shortened time to clinical recovery and reduced disease progression and viral persistence in adults with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 compared with placebo.

    DOI: 10.1177/03000605211013550
  3. Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Permethrin and Ivermectin in the Treatment of Scabies Barind Medical College Journal (2025) primary study Strong

    A comparative study of 100 scabies patients in Bangladesh found that topical permethrin was significantly more effective than oral ivermectin in reducing clinical scores over a two-week period, with distinct but mild adverse effect profiles for each treatment.

    DOI: 10.70818/bmcj.2025.v011i01.0173
  4. Severe cutaneous adverse reactions associated with systemic ivermectin: A pharmacovigilance analysis The Journal of Dermatology (2022) Thin

    Systemic ivermectin was significantly associated with increased reporting of severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs) in FAERS, especially toxidermias, though causality cannot be ascertained.

    DOI: 10.1111/1346-8138.16398
  5. Comparative study of oral ivermectin, topical permethrin and benzyl benzoate in the treatment of scabies International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences (2019) primary study Strong

    In a quasi-experimental comparison of 195 patients with uncomplicated scabies, single-application topical permethrin gave the highest 6-week improvement in pruritus (89.2%) and lesions (87.7%), significantly better than benzyl benzoate but not statistically different from oral i…

    DOI: 10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20195549
  6. Comparison of efficacy and safety of oral ivermectin with topical permethrin in treatment of scabies Journal of Pakistan Association of Dermatologists (2016) primary study Mixed

    In a quasi-experimental study, oral ivermectin (200 µg/kg, repeated once) was as effective as topical permethrin 5% for scabies at week 4 (79.5% vs 88.1%, p=0.157), but ivermectin had significantly more side effects (p=0.05).

    DOI: 10.66344/jpad.v20i4.382

Your question next

What do you want to know?

No question is too uncomfortable for the evidence. Bring yours.

Ask your question