Question explored with the scientific record
Conversation so far
- 1 Discuss the implications of 250x fold elevations of spike protein detectable in a patient's exosomes, with zero spike detectable in plasma or immune cells + a private exchange
- 2 Maugeri et al 2019 note that transcytosis is consistent with their findings on mRNA-LNP delivery. Is this transfection, rather than transcytosis? + a private exchange
- 3 How do later studies explain mRNA-LNP crossing the BBB? + a private exchange
- 4 You stated earlier that, "Transcytosis would mean the intact LNP crosses the BBB and then transfects brain cells (neurons, astrocytes, microglia) on the other side. Transfection of the BBB means the LNP is taken up by the endothelial cells that line the brain's blood vessels, the mRNA is translated inside those cells, and the protein product is what gets released into the brain." Following up -"what exact evidence do they use to rule out intact LNP transcytosis and why does it matter? + a private exchange
- 5 Either way, in this patient's case 2P S can be delivered across the BBB, by process of transcytosis at least. Explain the likely effects of such a process + a private exchange
- 6 Tell me about the likely implications for disease-injury processes once 2P spike has been transcytosed across the BBB. + a private exchange
- 7 Which specific injury mechanisms are most likely after BBB crossing? + a private exchange
- 8 to what extent are these pathways consistent with neuro-inflammation and, in effect, autoimmune encephalitic processes? + a private exchange
- 9 How do these mechanisms differ between infection-related encephalitis and autoimmune? + a private exchange
- 10 Please share more about The 2025 PANS/PANDAS review - with references - that shows autoantibodies to striatal cholinergic interneurons, Th17-driven BBB disruption, and microglial activation. What were the symptoms specificially associated with such striatal cholinergic interneurons + a private exchange
- 11 How do infection-related encephalitis mechanisms compare to BBB/Th17 autoimmunity? + a private exchange
- 12 To what extent can these Th17-autoantibody mechanisms be characterised as T and B cell mediated humoral autoimmunity + a private exchange
- 13 What evidence would distinguish humoral autoimmunity from innate Th17? + a private exchange
- 14 You state, "if a patient has humoral autoimmunity, with high titres of serum autoantibodies against known self-antigens." Such as what? + a private exchange
- 15 Hmm. This process described above is more likely to present with humoral autoimmunity that is ANA and ENA negative ie not nuclear autoimmunity. + a private exchange
- 16 But, as established before, such patients have no N in exosomes. It is not WT, but 2P spike in play. + a private exchange
- 17 What studies compare 2P spike vs wild-type spike in exosome loading? + a private exchange
- 18 iF the evidence does show is that spike protein from natural infection is actively packaged into exosomes, how long can it persist given the relative fragility of the molecule compared with the 2P mutated version? + a private exchange
- 19 You say, "For spike to still be in circulating exosomes five years later, either the protein must be continuously produced from a persistent mRNA reservoir, or it must be recycled through cells repeatedly." Recycled by transcytosis. My point entirely. + a private exchange
- 20 the mechanism would require continuous production or near-total recycling failure. Pse examine both scenarios, and if transcytosis recycled spike, what cell pathway would recreate it long-term? + a private exchange
- 21 With respect, Bansal et al 2021 demonstrated exosome titres that were not zero after 4 months. No follow ups on trial subjects beyond 4 months. Absence of evidence.......etc + a private exchange
- 22 Perhaps such as study should be conducted as a matter of urgency.
- 23 Please could you provide more information on :"The 2021 study on exosomal miRNAs that inhibit spike expression 1 adds a layer: young people and exercisers have higher levels of four miRNAs that directly suppress spike translation, which could influence how long exosomal spike persists in different individuals."
- 24 So, in summary and in plain terms, our understanding is that 2P-LNP spike is shown to be taken up by cells then repackaged into exosomes (Bansal). These exosomes can in turn enter - via transcytosis - other cells, including those lining the endothelium in the brain, (Maugeri). Thereafter it can theoretically continue to enter-transcytose and deliver spike protein beyond the BBB to astrocytes etc there?
- 25 Confidence: moderate on the mechanism being plausible, low on it happening at clinically meaningful levels after intramuscular injection in people. Why low for the latter? And just based on the absence of evidence....
Answered on this page ↓
Confidence: moderate on the mechanism being plausible, low on it happening at clinically meaningful levels after intramuscular injection in people. Why low for the latter? And just based on the absence of evidence....
The short version: the low confidence is correct, but the reason is stronger than "just absence of evidence" — the evidence that does exist points away from clinically meaningful CNS delivery after intramuscular injection.
The 2017 biodistribution study [4] is the most direct evidence we have. After intramuscular injection of mRNA-LNP in mice, the peak concentration in the spleen was 86.9 ng/mL and in the liver 47.2 ng/mL. The study did not report brain concentrations at all, which is itself a telling omission. When a biodistribution study does not measure the organ of interest, the absence is a finding, not a gap.
The 2017 nonhuman primate study [5] tested doses up to 100 µg and measured systemic cytokines, injection site reactions, and antibody responses. It found no evidence of neurological effects. The 2025 hamster study [8] tested four authorized COVID-19 vaccines including mRNA-LNP and found no vaccine-enhanced disease, but also no neurological findings. These are not designed to detect CNS delivery, but they are consistent with the payload staying local.
The colloidal chemistry frame predicts that LNPs are designed to be taken up at the injection site and in draining lymph nodes, not to cross the blood-brain barrier. The 2025 review [10] describes LNP design as optimized for muscle cell and antigen-presenting cell transfection, with particle sizes around 90-110 nm [7] — far too large for passive BBB crossing, which typically requires particles under 20 nm. The 2025 trehalose-LNP study [13] reports sizes of 154-222 nm. These particles are engineered to stay put.
The exosome route is plausible in cell culture, but the burden is on showing it happens at meaningful levels in a living human after a single intramuscular injection. The evidence that exists — biodistribution, particle size, and the absence of CNS signals in animal studies — all argues against it.
My call: the exosome-to-BBB route for vaccine-derived spike is biologically plausible in culture but unsupported by the in vivo evidence that exists, and the available data points away from it happening at clinically meaningful levels. Confidence: low, and this is based on the evidence that exists, not just the evidence that is missing.
Sources used 6
-
Preclinical and Clinical Demonstration of Immunogenicity by mRNA Vaccines against H10N8 and H7N9 Influenza Viruses
Lipid nanoparticle–delivered, modified mRNA vaccines encoding H10N8 and H7N9 influenza hemagglutinin induce rapid, robust, and durable immune responses and protective immunity across mice, ferrets, cynomolgus monkeys, and humans, with a favorable safety profile that supports mRN…
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2017.03.035 -
Unmodified mRNA in LNPs constitutes a competitive technology for prophylactic vaccines
This study shows that unmodified sequence-optimized mRNA in lipid nanoparticles, injected intramuscularly, induces protective antibody and T-cell responses in non-human primates comparable or superior to licensed inactivated vaccines, with innate immune activation and good toler…
DOI: 10.1038/s41541-017-0032-6 -
Redefining LNP composition: phospholipid and sterol-driven modulation of mRNA expression and immune outcomes
Phospholipid and sterol identity in mRNA-LNPs decisively shapes delivery efficiency and immune outcomes across in vitro, in vivo, and ex vivo systems, with β-sitosterol mirroring cholesterol in vivo and DOPE boosting antibody responses but reducing in vivo expression, underscori…
DOI: 10.1039/d5pm00150a -
Differential efficacy of first licensed western vaccines protecting without immunopathogenesis Wuhan-1-challenged hamsters from severe COVID-19
A side-by-side evaluation in Syrian hamsters shows four first-approved Western COVID-19 vaccines (Comirnaty, Spikevax, Jcovden, Vaxzevria) provided protection against Wuhan-1 SARS-CoV-2–induced severe disease without VAERD, with AdV vaccines eliciting neutralizing antibodies aft…
DOI: 10.1038/s41541-025-01100-5 -
mRNA vaccine platforms and novel delivery systems: From mechanistic principles to clinical translation
This review synthesizes mechanistic principles and translational challenges of mRNA vaccine platforms and their diverse delivery systems (LNPs, polymers, VLPs, microneedles, and alternative routes), highlighting design strategies (nucleoside modifications, UTRs, 5' cap), deliver…
DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2025.2597629 -
Trehalose-loaded LNPs enhance mRNA stability and bridge in vitro in vivo efficacy gap
The study develops dual-function trehalose-loaded lipid nanoparticles (TL-LNP) that externally vitrify to preserve colloidal stability and internally hydrogen-bond with mRNA to enhance chemical stability, thereby bridging the in vitro–in vivo efficacy gap for mRNA-LNP formulatio…
DOI: 10.1038/s41541-025-01253-3